The Gymshark Running 5" Shorts are a lined, lightweight running short for about $48. They have a brief liner, a zipped back pocket, reflective details and angled hems with side splits. One quirk: the listing says 5 inch but Gymshark's page states a 6 inch inseam at size M. Review volume is also low, so treat the early feedback as thin, and always check the details yourself before you order.
Illustration drawn from the product’s specs — see the brand’s site for real photos and colors.
Gymshark Running 5" Shorts Review (2026)
our rating
Best for: Budget runners who want a liner and splits.
Skip it if: You want extensive owner reviews before buying.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Brands can’t pay for placement, and it never changes our picks. How we make money.
What we like
- Brief liner with soft brushed lining
- Zip back pocket
- Reflective details
- Angled hems and open side splits
- $48 price
Watch out for
- Only 20 reviews on the page when checked (3.4 average)
- Listing title says 5 inch but the page states a 6 inch inseam at size M
- Few colors on the page
On this page
Fit and sizing
Sizes run XS to 3XL, and Gymshark describes a regular fit that reviewers mostly call true to size. Only one color (black) appeared on the page we read, though other colors exist in the collection. The page had only about 20 reviews with a 3.4 average when we checked, which is too small a sample to draw firm conclusions about durability. The 6 inch figure came from the page's "based on size M" note, and the URL also says short-6, so expect closer to 6 inches. Use the shorts finder to confirm the length you want.
Fabric and feel
The fabric is 86% recycled polyester and 14% elastane. Gymshark lists a soft brushed liner, a ventilation waistband, reflective details and an adjustable internal drawcord.
How it performs for running
The brief liner provides support, and the single secure zipped back pocket is the storage. Angled hems and open overlapping side splits aim for freedom of movement. We cannot judge long-run chafing from specs alone. For more picks, see our best running shorts for men.
Price and value
At about $48 it is close to the Under Armour Launch Elite, which has more reviews behind it. It is much cheaper than the Ten Thousand Distance.
Alternatives
For a cheaper non-run short, the Gymshark Arrival. For a better-reviewed premium option, the Lululemon Pace Breaker.
Who should skip it
Skip it if you want a deep owner review base, a short 5 inch cut as titled, or multiple pockets. Also skip it if you want a stated feature like a phone sleeve, since the single zipped back pocket is the only storage listed. Gymshark's return rules are summarized on our Gymshark brand page.
Specs
| For | Men |
|---|---|
| Sizes | XS–3XL |
| Extended fits | Plus sizes |
| Fabric | 86% recycled polyester, 14% elastane |
| Recycled materials | Yes (brand states) |
| Inseam options | 6″ |
| Liner | Brief |
| Pockets | Zip |
| Fit | Athletic |
| Fabric feel | Woven light |
| Waistband | Drawcord |
| Colors | 1 at time of checking |
| Good for | Running, Long runs, Everyday wear |
The verdict
A budget run short with a liner, zip pocket and recycled polyester. Limited reviews and the 5 versus 6 inch mismatch make it a little riskier than better-known options, but the price is fair for what you get on paper.
Alternatives to consider
Frequently asked questions
How much are the Gymshark Running 5" shorts?
$48 at regular price when we checked.
What is the real inseam?
The page states 6 inches at size M, although the listing title says 5 inch.
Do they have a liner?
Yes, an inner brief lining.
Do they have a zip pocket?
Yes, one secure zipped back pocket.
Sources and last checked · Oct 7, 2026
Notes: Product titled 'Running 5" Shorts' but page states 6" inseam (size M); URL slug says short-6. Using 6 in attrs. Ratings estimated.
- gymshark.com/products/gymshark-running-short-6-shorts-black-aw25
- gymshark.com/collections/shorts/mens
Specs and prices come from the sources above and change often; ratings are our editorial estimates, not lab tests. Spot something out of date? Tell us.